Our courts are not for sale Elon Musk
On Tuesday night, Wisconsin voters turned out in force to protect the integrity of their judicial system. Judge Susan Crawford, a respected and seasoned jurist, defeated Brad Schimel, a well-connected conservative backed by big-money donors. The outcome preserved the liberal majority on the Wisconsin Supreme Court and dealt a crushing blow to right-wing efforts to buy their way into the bench. But this wasn’t just about party politics. This was a full-scale rejection of outside interference, particularly from high-profile disruptors like Elon Musk. The result was clear: our courts are not for sale Elon Musk, and Wisconsin is not for sale either.
Musk’s online interference failed to influence voters
In the weeks leading up to the election, Elon Musk inserted himself into the race—not with money, but with manipulation. He used X (formerly Twitter) to amplify misinformation, question the legitimacy of the courts, and lend support to conservative causes pushing Schimel forward. His online activity added fuel to an already charged election cycle. However, his attempts to sway public opinion ultimately backfired. Voters didn’t respond to digital chaos. They responded to local leadership, legal fairness, and a campaign rooted in public trust.
Conservative donors pumped millions into Schimel’s campaign
Beyond Musk, Schimel’s run was backed by a wave of dark money from conservative super PACs, including several organizations tied to national Republican operatives and anti-abortion activists. Millions were spent on TV ads, mailers, and robocalls painting Crawford as a threat to “traditional values.” Despite this media blitz, the strategy collapsed. Wisconsin voters, many of whom have grown wary of outside money, didn’t fall for it. They saw through the messaging and chose a judge with experience, objectivity, and a real connection to state law.
Crawford focused on people, not politics
While her opponent and his supporters leaned into fear-mongering, Judge Crawford ran a steady, grounded campaign. She visited dozens of towns, held public forums, and answered real questions from real people. Her message was simple: the law must work for everyone—not just the rich or powerful. Her refusal to engage in political mudslinging set her apart. Voters noticed. Even independents and moderate conservatives crossed party lines to support her. It wasn’t about red or blue—it was about protecting judicial independence.
Musk’s loss is symbolic, not just strategic
Let’s be honest—Brad Schimel was the face on the ballot, but Elon Musk was the shadow behind the curtain. Musk has increasingly tried to shape public discourse through his online platform and his own political leanings. He’s backed extreme candidates, criticized court rulings, and even mocked judicial institutions. But in Wisconsin, his influence met its limit. This race became a referendum on celebrity intervention in democracy, and the voters shut the door on it.
A critical seat with national consequences
This seat wasn’t just about state law—it was about national momentum. The Wisconsin Supreme Court will likely weigh in on crucial issues tied to abortion access, redistricting, and election integrity in 2024 and 2025. A shift to the right could have changed the outcome of those rulings. That’s why this race drew attention from coast to coast. And that’s why Musk’s involvement raised so many alarms. But in the end, it didn’t matter. Grassroots power beat billionaires again.
Final verdict: the courts belong to the people
This election proved that voters still hold the line when it matters. No amount of influence—be it financial or digital—can override the will of engaged, informed citizens. Wisconsin showed the country that democracy isn’t for sale. Justice isn’t a brand, and judges aren’t trophies. Our courts are not for sale Elon Musk, and thanks to Wisconsin, that message is now echoing nationwide Just Now News.
About the Author
Discover more from JUSTNOWNEWS®
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
